OverviewDailyWeeklyTechniciansTech Overview

Repair Logs

synced 8d ago
62
Logged Rows
62
Unique Items
2
Technicians
16
Labor Hours
from 61 rows (98%)
0
Search Hours
from 0 rows (0%)
$0
Parts Cost
from 0 rows (0%)
Clear 2
DisciplineApprentice × StatusQuality Check ×
Week 2026-W37· 2026-09-14 → 2026-09-16· 16 min avg/job· 12 brands
Week · 2026-W37 2026-09-14 → 2026-09-16 · pick a bar to change period
←
→
2025-W16 32 weeks available 2026-W37
Useful?
Parts Hold Watchlist 0 jobs waiting on parts
0
Jobs Held
0
Items Held
$0
Parts Value
By Brand
Nothing held.
By Part Needed
Nothing held.
Useful?
Status Funnel where work accumulates
1 Quality Check 100% 62 search
2 Re-estimate 0% 0 search
3 Parts Hold 0% 0 search
4 Incomplete 0% 0 search
5 Complete 0% 0 search
6 Not Repaired 0% 0 search
Useful?
Fault Pareto 2 of 10 faults = 80% of work
1Foam Bad 77.4%
2Grip Loose 82.3%
3Aper Inop 87.1%
4Aper Oily 90.3%
5Zoom Stiff 91.9%
6Zoom Loose 93.5%
7Focus Squeek 95.2%
8Focus Loose 96.8%
9Aper Sticky 98.4%
10AF Erratic 100%
Useful?
Who Fixes What 9 single-tech faults · darker = more jobs
Foam BadGrip LooseAper InopAper OilyZoom StiffZoom LooseFocus SqueekFocus LooseAper StickyAF Erratic
Sam 27332111111
Oakley 21
Useful?
By Diagnosis what actually broke
1Foam Bad 12 h 48 2Grip Loose 1 h 3 3Aper Inop 1 h 3 4Aper Oily 1 h 2 5Zoom Stiff 0 h 1 6Zoom Loose 0 h 1 7Focus Squeek 0 h 1 8Focus Loose 0 h 1 9Aper Sticky 0 h 1 10AF Erratic 0 h 1
Useful?
By Technician 2 shown
1Sam 12 h 41 2Oakley 4 h 21
Useful?
By Status 1 shown
1Quality Check 16 h 62
Useful?
By Brand 12 shown
1Nikon 3 h 10 2Pentax 2 h 7 3Minolta 2 h 6 4Canon 1 h 4 5Olympus 1 h 3 6Sony 1 h 2 7Sigma 1 h 2 8Mamiya 1 h 2 9Hasselblad 1 h 2 10Other 0 h 1 11Konica 0 h 1 12Bronica 0 h 1
Useful?
By Repair Code 9 shown
1Foam 7 h 27 2FOAM 4 h 21 3R20 2 h 5 4R22 1 h 3 5GripL 1 h 2 6R25 0 h 1 7R02 0 h 1 8R01 0 h 1 9AI 0 h 1
Useful?
By Discipline 1 shown
1Apprentice 16 h 62
Useful?
By Repair Owner 2 shown
1KEH 12 h 41 2Training 4 h 21
Useful?