OverviewDailyWeeklyTechniciansTech Overview

Repair Logs

synced 9d ago
29
Logged Rows
29
Unique Items
3
Technicians
37
Labor Hours
from 29 rows (100%)
1
Search Hours
from 1 rows (3%)
$124
Parts Cost
from 2 rows (7%)
Clear 3
DisciplineLens × StatusNot Repaired × CodeR22 ×
2025-02-25 → 2026-07-23· 76 min avg/job· 8 brands
Volume by Month hover a column for hours and cost
1
25-02
3
25-03
1
25-04
3
25-05
1
25-08
3
25-09
1
25-11
2
25-12
3
26-02
3
26-03
3
26-04
2
26-06
3
26-07
Useful?
Parts Hold Watchlist 0 jobs waiting on parts
0
Jobs Held
0
Items Held
$0
Parts Value
By Brand
Nothing held.
By Part Needed
Nothing held.
Useful?
Status Funnel where work accumulates
1 Quality Check 0% 0 search
2 Re-estimate 0% 0 search
3 Parts Hold 0% 0 search
4 Incomplete 0% 0 search
5 Complete 0% 0 search
6 Not Repaired 100% 29 search
Useful?
Fault Pareto 6 of 9 faults = 80% of work
1Zoom Rough 21.7%
2Focus Rough 43.5%
3Zoom Stiff 56.5%
4Focus Squeek 69.6%
5Focus Stiff 78.3%
6AF Erratic 87%
7Parts Missing 91.3%
8Aper Oily 95.7%
9AF inop 100%
Useful?
Who Fixes What 6 single-tech faults · darker = more jobs
Zoom RoughFocus RoughZoom StiffFocus SqueekFocus StiffAF ErraticParts MissingAper OilyAF inop
Remy 422322111
Harlow34 21
Harlow 11
Useful?
By Diagnosis what actually broke
1Zoom Rough 2 h 5 2Focus Rough 10 h 5 3Zoom Stiff 7 h 3 4Focus Squeek 2 h 3 5Focus Stiff 3 h 2 6AF Erratic 1 h 2 7Parts Missing 0 h 1 8Aper Oily 4 h 1 9AF inop 1 h 1
Useful?
By Technician 3 shown
1Remy 23 h 24 2Harlow34 12 h 3 3Harlow 3 h 2
Useful?
By Status 1 shown
1Not Repaired 37 h 29
Useful?
By Brand 8 shown
1Nikon 12 h 10 2Canon 14 h 7 3Sony 2 h 4 4Sigma 1 h 3 5Fujifilm 2 h 2 6Zeiss 0 h 1 7Olympus 2 h 1 8Mamiya 4 h 1
Useful?
By Repair Code 1 shown
1R22 37 h 29
Useful?
By Discipline 1 shown
1Lens 37 h 29
Useful?
By Repair Owner 2 shown
1KEH 29 h 26 2Training 8 h 3
Useful?